Quantum Computing Qubit Counts: 2026 Status Report
A simple guide to understanding where quantum computers are today and when they might break cryptocurrency encryption
What Are Qubits?
Think of qubits as the "bits" of quantum computers, but much more powerful and fragile:
Physical Qubits (Noisy Qubits)
The actual hardware qubits. They make errors frequently - like typing on a keyboard where 1 in 100 keys presses the wrong letter.
Logical Qubits (Error-Corrected Qubits)
Groups of physical qubits working together to create one reliable qubit. It takes hundreds or thousands of physical qubits to make one logical qubit that actually works reliably.
The Goal: To break Bitcoin or Ethereum encryption, you need about 1,600-2,600 logical qubits, which translates to roughly 2-4 million physical qubits.
Current Quantum Computing Status by Company
| Company | Technology | Physical Qubits (2025-26) | Logical Qubits (Current / Target) | Target Year | Key Achievement | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBM | Superconducting | 156 (Heron R2) | 1-2 / 200 | 2029 | 50x faster operations. Starling system: 200 logical qubits, 100M error-corrected operations. System Two deployed. | Roadmap |
| Superconducting | 105 (Willow) | Below-threshold demo / 100+ | 2028-29 | First to prove error correction scales. Exponential error reduction. Completed RCS benchmark in <5min (10^25 years classical). Holy grail achieved. | Willow Chip | |
| IonQ | Trapped Ion | 64 → 256 (2026) | 0 / 1,600 (2028), 40,000-80,000 (2030) | 2028-30 | 99.99% accuracy (world record). Most aggressive timeline to CRQC. Acquired Oxford Ionics & Skyloom. Could break Bitcoin by 2028-2030 if targets met. | Roadmap |
| Quantinuum | Trapped Ion | 56 (Helios) | 12 / Tens | 2030 (Apollo) | Most efficient: 3 physical per 1 logical qubit. 99.921% two-qubit fidelity. All-to-all connectivity. QV >2 million. Highest quality today. | Website |
| Atom Computing | Neutral Atom | 1,225 | Developing / 100+ | 2027-28 | Largest deployed system. Room-temperature operation. Microsoft partnership. Scaling to 100,000 atoms in coming years. | Website |
| QuEra | Neutral Atom | 448 (demo), 256 (commercial) | R&D / 10-100 | 2027-28 | Harvard/MIT collaboration. 448-atom architecture. Delivered to AIST Japan. Flexible 2D/3D atom arrangements. | Website |
| Pasqal | Neutral Atom | 1,000 → 10,000 (2026) | In dev / Scalable | 2026-28 | Aggressive scaling: 10,000 physical qubits by 2026. European quantum leader. Focus on optimization & simulation. | Website |
| Rigetti | Superconducting | 84 (Ankaa-3) | In dev / 100+ | 2028-30 | 99.5% two-qubit fidelity. Modular architecture. Plans: 1,000+ physical by 2026, 100,000 logical by 2030. | Website |
| PsiQuantum | Photonic | Development phase | 0 / 100+ | 2027-28 | Most ambitious: 1M+ physical photonic qubits by 2027-28. Room temp. Uses semiconductor fabs. $1.3B+ funding. Moonshot bet. | Website |
| Microsoft | Topological | Majorana 1 prototype | R&D phase / TBD | Years not decades | Most experimental. First topological materials demo. Could need fewer physical qubits if proven. Hedging with IonQ, Quantinuum, Atom partnerships. | Azure Quantum |
| D-Wave | Quantum Annealing | 5,000+ | N/A (not universal) | Commercial now | Only deployed commercial system. On-chip cryogenic control. Acquired Quantum Circuits Inc. Cannot break encryption - optimization only. | Website |
| Oxford Ionics | Trapped Ion | R&D prototypes | N/A (acquired by IonQ) | Merged 2025 | Previous 99.99% world record holder. Electronic qubit control tech now part of IonQ stack. | Website |
IBM
RoadmapTechnology: Superconducting
Physical Qubits: 156 (Heron R2)
Logical Qubits: 1-2 / 200
Target Year: 2029
Achievement: 50x faster operations. Starling system: 200 logical qubits, 100M error-corrected operations. System Two deployed.
Technology: Superconducting
Physical Qubits: 105 (Willow)
Logical Qubits: Below-threshold demo / 100+
Target Year: 2028-29
Achievement: First to prove error correction scales. Exponential error reduction. Completed RCS benchmark in <5min (10^25 years classical). Holy grail achieved.
IonQ
RoadmapTechnology: Trapped Ion
Physical Qubits: 64 → 256 (2026)
Logical Qubits: 0 / 1,600 (2028), 40,000-80,000 (2030)
Target Year: 2028-30
Achievement: 99.99% accuracy (world record). Most aggressive timeline to CRQC. Acquired Oxford Ionics & Skyloom. Could break Bitcoin by 2028-2030 if targets met.
Quantinuum
WebsiteTechnology: Trapped Ion
Physical Qubits: 56 (Helios)
Logical Qubits: 12 / Tens
Target Year: 2030 (Apollo)
Achievement: Most efficient: 3 physical per 1 logical qubit. 99.921% two-qubit fidelity. All-to-all connectivity. QV >2 million. Highest quality today.
Atom Computing
WebsiteTechnology: Neutral Atom
Physical Qubits: 1,225
Logical Qubits: Developing / 100+
Target Year: 2027-28
Achievement: Largest deployed system. Room-temperature operation. Microsoft partnership. Scaling to 100,000 atoms in coming years.
QuEra
WebsiteTechnology: Neutral Atom
Physical Qubits: 448 (demo), 256 (commercial)
Logical Qubits: R&D / 10-100
Target Year: 2027-28
Achievement: Harvard/MIT collaboration. 448-atom architecture. Delivered to AIST Japan. Flexible 2D/3D atom arrangements.
Pasqal
WebsiteTechnology: Neutral Atom
Physical Qubits: 1,000 → 10,000 (2026)
Logical Qubits: In dev / Scalable
Target Year: 2026-28
Achievement: Aggressive scaling: 10,000 physical qubits by 2026. European quantum leader. Focus on optimization & simulation.
Rigetti
WebsiteTechnology: Superconducting
Physical Qubits: 84 (Ankaa-3)
Logical Qubits: In dev / 100+
Target Year: 2028-30
Achievement: 99.5% two-qubit fidelity. Modular architecture. Plans: 1,000+ physical by 2026, 100,000 logical by 2030.
PsiQuantum
WebsiteTechnology: Photonic
Physical Qubits: Development phase
Logical Qubits: 0 / 100+
Target Year: 2027-28
Achievement: Most ambitious: 1M+ physical photonic qubits by 2027-28. Room temp. Uses semiconductor fabs. $1.3B+ funding. Moonshot bet.
Microsoft
Azure QuantumTechnology: Topological
Physical Qubits: Majorana 1 prototype
Logical Qubits: R&D phase / TBD
Target Year: Years not decades
Achievement: Most experimental. First topological materials demo. Could need fewer physical qubits if proven. Hedging with IonQ, Quantinuum, Atom partnerships.
D-Wave
WebsiteTechnology: Quantum Annealing
Physical Qubits: 5,000+
Logical Qubits: N/A (not universal)
Target Year: Commercial now
Achievement: Only deployed commercial system. On-chip cryogenic control. Acquired Quantum Circuits Inc. Cannot break encryption - optimization only.
Oxford Ionics
WebsiteTechnology: Trapped Ion
Physical Qubits: R&D prototypes
Logical Qubits: N/A (acquired by IonQ)
Target Year: Merged 2025
Achievement: Previous 99.99% world record holder. Electronic qubit control tech now part of IonQ stack.
Technology Type Explanations:
Superconducting
Ultra-cold circuits (colder than space). Fast gates but need extreme cooling.
Trapped Ion
Individual atoms held by lasers. Very accurate but slower operations.
Neutral Atom
Arrays of atoms in laser traps. Highly scalable, can operate warmer.
Photonic
Uses light particles. Room temperature potential, uses standard chip fabs.
Topological
Theoretical. Qubits inherently protected from errors (if it works).
Quantum Annealing
Specialized for optimization only. Not universal quantum computing.
Definitions & Terminology
| Term | Simple Explanation |
|---|---|
| Physical Qubits | The actual hardware qubits. Error-prone (like a keyboard where 1 in 100 keys fail). |
| Logical Qubits | Error-corrected qubits made from 100s-1000s of physical qubits working together. |
| Below Threshold | Critical milestone where adding MORE qubits REDUCES errors (Google Willow achieved this in 2024). |
| FTQC (Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computing) | Quantum computers that can run indefinitely without errors accumulating. The end goal. |
| Gate Fidelity | Accuracy of quantum operations. 99.99% ("four nines") is the threshold for practical error correction. |
| CRQC | Cryptographically Relevant Quantum Computer - powerful enough to break current encryption standards. |
| Surface Code | Error correction technique arranging physical qubits in 2D grids. Each patch = 1 logical qubit. |
| Quantum Volume (QV) | Holistic performance measure (not just qubit count - includes quality, connectivity, error rates). |
Data Sources
- Company roadmaps and official announcements (IBM, Google, IonQ, Quantinuum, etc.)
- Nature journal publications (Google Willow, Harvard/MIT research)
- The Quantum Insider industry analysis
- NIST post-quantum cryptography standards (FIPS 203-205)
- Riverlane QEC Report 2025
Last Updated: January 27, 2026